An Improved Sequentially Rejective Bonferroni Test Procedure
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
This paper presents a simple and widely applicable multiple test procedure of the sequentially rejective type, i.e. hypotheses are rejected one at a tine until no further rejections can be done. It is shown that the test has a prescribed level of significance protection against error of the first kind for any combination of true hypotheses. The power properties of the test and a number of possi...
متن کاملModified Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedures
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive o...
متن کاملA Stagewise Rejective Multiple Test Procedure Based on a Modified Bonferroni Test
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive o...
متن کاملA graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures.
For clinical trials with multiple treatment arms or endpoints a variety of sequentially rejective, weighted Bonferroni-type tests have been proposed, such as gatekeeping procedures, fixed sequence tests, and fallback procedures. They allow to map the difference in importance as well as the relationship between the various research questions onto an adequate multiple test procedure. Since these ...
متن کاملHolm ’ s Sequential Bonferroni Procedure
The more statistical tests we perform, the more likely we are to reject the null hypothesis when it is true (i.e., a “false alarm,” also called a “Type 1” error). This is a consequence of the logic of hypothesis testing: We reject the null hypothesis for rare events, and the larger the number of tests, the easier it is to find rare events which are false alarms. This problem is called the infla...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Biometrics
سال: 1987
ISSN: 0006-341X
DOI: 10.2307/2531823